Skip to main content

Impact analysis: Enacted Medicare cuts

DataGen has completed its analysis of enacted Medicare cuts, the results of which are shared here. Please note that this analysis is intended for advocacy purposes only and should be used as an indication of the extent to which hospital providers nationwide have been impacted by existing Medicare provider payment cuts.

These cuts were enacted by Congress to achieve Medicare payment policy and long-term deficit reduction goals. This DataGen impact analysis includes major cuts enacted since 2010.

The enacted legislative cuts analyzed consist of:

  • Medicare marketbasket, Medicare Disproportionate Share Hospital and quality adjustments authorized by the Affordable Care Act of 2010; note that for the purposes of this analysis, quality adjustments are broken out into their own category;
  • the effect of the 2.0% across-the-board sequestration reduction to payments authorized by the Budget Control Act of 2011;
  • inpatient coding adjustment reductions authorized by the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012;
  • the reduction in bad debt payments authorized by the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012;
  • payment adjustments for services paid for under the clinical laboratory fee schedule authorized by the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014;
  • reduction of OPPS payments to non-excepted off-campus sites to a level equivalent to that paid under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule required by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015;
  • marketbasket adjustments authorized by the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015;
  • change in Home Health Prospective Payment System payments resulting from the implementation of the Patient-Driven Grouping Model; and
  • payment reductions authorized by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, including adding hospice to the Inpatient PPS short-stay post-acute care transfer policy.
The enacted regulatory cuts analyzed consist of:
  • regulatory coding adjustments implemented by CMS;
  • 2.0% reduction to the calendar year 2016 outpatient marketbasket update for rate inflation due to packaging of laboratory payments;
  • long-term care hospital site-neutral payment adjustment implemented in the federal fiscal year 2016 final rule;
  • net payment impacts resulting from CMS’ reduction in OPPS payments for 340B Program purchased drugs;
  • reduction in payments for Wholesale Acquisition Cost-based drugs from WAC+6% to WAC+3%;
  • change in Skilled Nursing Facility PPS payment methodology from the Resource Utilization Group-IV system to the Patient-Driven Payment Model; and
  • reduction of OPPS payments for clinic services provided at excepted off-campus sites to a level equivalent to that paid under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule.

The quality cuts analyzed include estimated impacts from Medicare’s Value-based Purchasing, Readmissions Reduction and Hospital-acquired Conditions programs.

These cuts could have a major impact on hospital finances and operations in the coming years. To learn more about this impact and about how to thrive in alternative payment models, contact us today.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unlock the Potential of Value-based Payment

A common misconception in healthcare practices: Organizations can quickly reap the benefits of value-based payment transformation. To launch a successful value-based payment program , practices must implement a variety of foundational pieces. It may take time, resources and data before a practice can successfully engage in VBP. In this blog, we'll cover what goes into VBP and its potential benefits. We'll also dig deeper into practice advancement strategies and how they can help you achieve your practice goals. What goes into VBP? Many practices want to implement VBP because of its payment structure and return on investment. Yet, they might not consider how to nurture a successful VBP program in their organization. It starts with a gap analysis regarding people, processes and technologies. It’s important to celebrate what is working well and intervene where improvement can be made. Successful VBP starts with the practice team. There are many perceptions vs. realities that exist

BPCIA: 4 fast facts for a successful Model Year 7 kickoff

Participation in Model Year 7 launched on Jan. 1, 2024, with the first few months being a critical time for providers. New Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced Model (BPCIA) participants got their footing, and continuing participants were able to change their clinical episode service line groups for the first time since 2020.  If you’re a provider participating in this model, read on for a BPCIA refresher and four fast facts for starting MY7 right. We’ll also cover core analytics activities to support your clinical and operational success.   4 Fast facts on BPCIA Model Year 7  1.   Focus on clinical episodes and episode volume  Before MY7 began, providers used historic baseline data provided by CMS to evaluate which CESLGs they would go at risk for, ensuring there would be sufficient episode volume. Large episode volume (100 episodes/year or more) reduces random variation and helps protect providers from financial risk associated with outlier Medicare episode spend.    During