Skip to main content

What to expect from CMS’ second decade of APM programs

CMS has introduced more than 50 innovative care delivery models designed to drive health system transformation over the last decade. Only six of those produced significant savings; of those, only four met the requirements to be expanded.

As the second 10-year period of the program gets underway, which includes $10 billion in new funding, CMS’ Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation is considering numerous changes to improve the overall success of these programs and, in turn, drive overall gains in care outcomes and health equity. When evaluating what has worked in the past and what changes are needed moving forward, it is important to review what success looks like for Alternative Payment Model programs. 

CMMI relies on three benchmarks to measure levels of success:

  1. The gold standard: improving quality of care while simultaneously reducing expenditures.
  2. Improving quality of care without impacting expenditures.
  3. Reducing expenditures without impacting quality of care.

To better meet these metrics, major adjustments must be made moving forward to enable health systems to improve the value for the communities. CMS has identified the hurdles involved and has proposed next steps, including steps to 1) simplify programs, 2) increase health equity, and 3) drive further provider participation. 

Here is more on the key changes CMS must make to advance these goals:

  1. Fewer and more parsimonious models that simplify overlap issues. Complex payment policies and model overlap rules can make participation difficult due to conflicting or opposing incentives and rules, high administrative burden and prohibitive investments. To address this, CMS must make APM requirements as transparent and easy to understand as possible, while integrating with other APMs and value-based care programs. This will simplify scaling and integration into broader CMS operations for participants.
  2. An emphasis on health equity must be considered with any new model designs. Currently, APMs do not reflect the full diversity of beneficiaries represented in Medicare and Medicaid, and their success has not been assessed across diverse populations. For future models, CMMI is working to understand barriers to participation, reducing implicit bias in model design and implementation, and better analyzing the impact of its models across more diverse populations.
  3. CMS must drive additional provider participation and minimize selection bias.  Model participation has been limited and affected by selection bias since providers are able to opt in to models only if they project savings. This can ultimately impact the evaluation of existing models’ success. Selection bias issues can be addressed by reducing risk of participation, especially to those who serve traditionally underserved communities, and adjusting model design to encourage participation.  

Data analytics is the key for future APM participation

As CMMI begins to employ these changes, providers can prepare for and more successfully participate in APMs through emerging digital health options. As the industry continues to digitize, processing data efficiently will become a requirement, rather than an option. A strong data analytics infrastructure can offer an indication of which programs are right for you, measure performance of existing programs and quantify results. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Patient Safety Initiatives: 5 Data Factors to Know

The Surveys on Patient Safety Culture™ (SOPS®) take your hospital’s pulse. The results help answer questions like:  Are staff focused on patient safety?  What are our safety results and where can we improve?  How do we take our scores and use them to transform patient outcomes?  How do we build staff confidence?  How do we stress the importance of patient safety?  When used strategically, the required SOPS® survey data can reveal important insights — that go beyond maintaining The Joint Commission accreditation. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality offers data collection as a part of the SOPS® survey. Though you’re spending the resources and time to complete this requirement, this effort alone doesn’t improve patient safety. You need to know which safety initiatives to target, followed by the outcomes and impact. A deep dive into the data can deliver that.  In this blog, we'll examine five important factors that impact patient safety data and initiatives, including surve
Post a Comment
Read more

Five key components of a strong patient safety culture

In today’s healthcare environment, ensuring patient safety is more than just a priority — it’s a fundamental component of quality care. Establishing a strong patient safety culture within hospitals and health organizations can dramatically reduce errors, increase patient satisfaction and improve overall healthcare outcomes. But what exactly is a patient safety culture, and how can institutions cultivate it effectively?  This blog post explores the five key components that make up a robust patient safety culture, along with insights from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and The Joint Commission.  What is patient safety culture?  AHRQ defines patient safety culture as how an organization's culture supports and promotes patient safety. This can extend to multiple levels, from individual units to departments to system levels. The AHRQ patient safety culture survey encompasses the shared values, beliefs and norms of healthcare practitioners and staff that influence
Post a Comment
Read more