Skip to main content

Linking financial strain to medical and social need

The most immediate point of intersection between hospitals and consumer financial risk is the inability of patients to pay their medical bills. This is changing as the role of hospitals in meeting social determinants of health (SDOH) expands. Low incomes and poor health outcomes are linked across multiple conditions and stages of life.

The short- and long-term risks of financial security are amplified for providers and patients, given just how close so many in the U.S. are to economic shocks they cannot cover or rebound from:

  • A Federal Reserve survey found that 36% of adults could not pay cash to cover a $400 emergency expense; even those who could cover the expense might tap savings or a credit card to meet the immediate need (2020).
  • Race-related outcomes are worse: nearly 40% of employed Black or Hispanic adults in the same survey reported that a $400 emergency expense would make it harder to pay other bills, compared to 18% of employed white adults.
  • This can create a snowball effect, what Health Affairs calls a “crowding out . . . on other important financial obligations such as rent, food, energy and medical debt” (2022).

A person in these circumstances may find themselves not only ill but in need of social services for the first time. Hospitals can help make the connection through data and analytics that link SDOH risk, medical need and community resources.

Finance: Definition, dimensions and risk

As highlighted in a previous blog, finance is one of six SDOH categories that DataGen uses to help hospitals measure social risk: a measure of the non-clinical vulnerabilities that affect individuals and the community. The SDOH categories, including food, housing, transportation, digital competency, and health literacy, can be used discretely or collectively to assess risk, design and deploy interventions, and quantify their impact on the people who need them most.

DataGen’s financial SDOH data is licensed through Socially Determined ­and includes three dimensions: Strength, Resources and Resiliency. Each category contains drivers that help hospitals calculate social risk (none to high) and prioritize need. Individual risk drivers include financial assets and liabilities, while community risk drivers capture macro income and cost of living. Opportunities are drivers at both levels.

To link SDOH investment, resource planning and ROI, hospitals have access to nearly 70 data elements that DataGen uses to identify and calculate risk, scoped into ZIP Code or out to larger disadvantaged areas.

Financial strain, disease and social services

The Milbank Quarterly has highlighted income as key to the “fundamental cause theory of disease” and names social services as one of four ways to address “income-related health inequities.”

Hospitals are under increased pressure to offer market solutions here, but how? One example is a health system that uses social risk data and healthcare analytics to identify its most disadvantaged market. They then partner at no cost with a national non-profit to open multiple counseling centers within that footprint — addressing needs in a targeted, collaborative way.

Through such centers, other SDOH needs are revealed via an analytics-forward approach that is sustainable and long-term. And this is just what patients and providers need: the ability to avoid risk, minimize adverse consequences and improve outcomes across a variety of circumstances.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why it's critical for Primary Care First participants to control and understand leakage

Patients' primary care visits outside of their attributed primary care office, also called “leaked” patient visits, can have unintended consequences for Primary Care First participants. Beginning July 2022, PCF Cohort 1 will face a reduction in population-based payments based on their leakage rate. The payment adjustment will be based on their 2021 claims data and will roll forward quarterly. To calculate your leakage rate, divide the number of qualifying visits and services your attributed beneficiaries have made to care centers outside of your practice (for example, visits to urgent care centers) by the total number of qualifying visits and services your attributed beneficiaries have made. Calculating primary care leakage with claims data alone comes with some unintended challenges. Unfortunately, some circumstances can unfairly and negatively impact a practice’s leakage rate: Nuances classifying care delivered by provider team members: It’s difficult to distinguish

Start the year off right: DataGen answers your Primary Care First questions

The Primary Care First Model , an alternative payment model offering an innovative payment structure for the delivery of advanced primary care, welcomed the involvement of Cohort 2 participants on Jan. 1 . This cohort, which was open to all primary care practices that met the eligibility criteria, will participate from 2022 to 2026. Participants in PCF Cohorts 1 and 2 can expect the following benefits: an opportunity to increase revenue with performance-based payments that reward participants for reducing acute hospital utilization; the ability to assess and improve performance through actionable, timely data; less administrative burden so providers can spend more time focusing on patient needs; and potential to become a Qualifying APM Participant , which includes eligibility for a 5% incentive payment and eliminates Merit-based Incentive Payment System reporting requirements. To ensure that new and prior participants succeed in this model, DataGen has compiled and answered some of t

What to expect from CMS’ second decade of APM programs

CMS has introduced more than 50 innovative care delivery models designed to drive health system transformation over the last decade. Only six of those produced significant savings; of those, only four met the requirements to be expanded. As the second 10-year period of the program gets underway, which includes $10 billion in new funding, CMS’ Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation is considering numerous changes to improve the overall success of these programs and, in turn, drive overall gains in care outcomes and health equity. When evaluating what has worked in the past and what changes are needed moving forward, it is important to review what success looks like for Alternative Payment Model programs.  CMMI relies on three benchmarks to measure levels of success: The gold standard: improving quality of care while simultaneously reducing expenditures. Improving quality of care without impacting expenditures. Reducing expenditures without impacting quality of car