Skip to main content

5 key steps to operationalize the Enhancing Oncology Model

5 key steps to operationalize the Enhancing Oncology Model

CMS’ new Enhancing Oncology Model seeks to improve cancer care coordination, drive practice transformation and reduce Medicare fee-for-service spending through episode-based payment.

Launched July 1, EOM replaces the Oncology Care Model as CMS seeks to build on lessons learned and challenges of cancer care cost management.

In this blog, we explore five best practices your oncology practice can use to kick-start EOM.

How to operationalize your Enhancing Oncology Model

1. Lay the foundation with core value-based care principles

While CMS models change, many value-based care elements are evergreen and can benefit from practices that:

  • identify physician champions;
  • inform and align practice leadership;
  • define success markers to track progress;
  • identify core team member roles and goals; and
  • establish quality measure reporting.

The latter may require EOM practices to add metrics to their electronic health records, such as depression screening and pain management. While this example is model-specific, reassessing quality programs and how EHRs can best support them is a core practice redesign principle. See step four below for more details.

2. Refine patient identification

Poorly defined VBC populations lead to missed opportunities for more targeted patient care and maximum performance incentives. This is particularly true for EOM, which CMS has limited to seven cancer types — breast cancer, small intestine/colorectal cancer, lung and prostate cancer and chronic leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma — with select diagnostic codes and initiating chemotherapy treatments. Practices are required to abstract and submit clinical data elements not found in claims data for at least 90% of their total attributed episodes on a semi-annual basis.

CMS will use this information to apply clinical adjustments to control for known differences in episode expenditures. Ever-metastatic status will be an applicable adjustment for breast cancer, small intestine/colorectal cancer and lung cancer episodes. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status will be an additional adjustment for breast cancer episodes.

Clinical specificity paints a living picture of a practice's oncology patients: who they are, what they need and how their experience and outcomes can be improved. This specificity is vital for oncology care episodes, which can include a broader range of services than more straightforward VBC models.

3. Earn and reinvest incentives

EOM practices may submit monthly enhanced oncology services claims for attributed patients in each month of the episode (up to six times total). Practices will receive $70 per EOM beneficiary per month and an additional $30 per EOM beneficiary per month for beneficiaries who are dually eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid.

The additional payment for dual eligible beneficiaries will not be included in the EOM practice’s total cost of care accountability. This is meant to avoid any potential disincentive for treating beneficiaries who tend to account for higher episode expenditures.

Month Enhanced Oncology Services payments are intended to support the implementation of enhanced oncology services. Providers can use these payments to fund ongoing redesign activities that foster practice-wide quality improvement beyond EOM model requirements.

4. Embrace practice redesign

Like VBC in general, practice redesign is a discipline. It takes time and requires continuous investment to pay dividends, financial and otherwise. Required EOM redesign elements include:

  • 24/7 access to clinicians who can access the patient’s EHR in real-time;
  • outpatient navigation services that span the cancer care journey;
  • detailed care plans shared with patients;
  • patient experience data; and
  • social drivers of health screening as part of routine practice.

The last requirement is new to EOM (versus OCM) and aligns with CMS' focus on health equity and how social determinants of health impact health outcomes.

Need key data insights backed by an analytics-first approach? Contact DataGen for a free consultation.

If you want more details on how EOM differs from CMS' prior demonstration (OCM), read DataGen’s September blog. To see DataGen's key findings and in-depth analysis of EOM’s national baseline and prediction module methodology, watch our recorded webinar.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Five key components of a strong patient safety culture

In today’s healthcare environment, ensuring patient safety is more than just a priority — it’s a fundamental component of quality care. Establishing a strong patient safety culture within hospitals and health organizations can dramatically reduce errors, increase patient satisfaction and improve overall healthcare outcomes. But what exactly is a patient safety culture, and how can institutions cultivate it effectively?  This blog post explores the five key components that make up a robust patient safety culture, along with insights from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and The Joint Commission.  What is patient safety culture?  AHRQ defines patient safety culture as how an organization's culture supports and promotes patient safety. This can extend to multiple levels, from individual units to departments to system levels. The AHRQ patient safety culture survey encompasses the shared values, beliefs and norms of healthcare practitioners and staff that...

Community Health Assessment: How to Increase Collaboration

Community Health Assessments (CHAs) are vital for pinpointing community health needs. Enhancing CHAs with greater collaboration, stakeholder engagement and innovation significantly boosts their effectiveness and impact. The biennial CHA process utilizes primary and secondary data to identify priority issues, which assists in developing the Community Health Implementation Plan (CHIP).   1. Engage diverse stakeholders  Inclusive partnerships are essential for addressing health needs effectively by engaging a broad spectrum of stakeholders, including community-based organizations, healthcare providers and policymakers. By involving diverse groups, you can gain a comprehensive understanding of health needs and ensure strong support for health initiatives.   The National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) emphasizes that engaging a variety of stakeholders is crucial for gathering diverse insights and securing backing for these initiatives.   B...