Skip to main content

Home Health Prospective Payment System: More catch-up cuts in 2024 annual rule

Home Health Prospective Payment System: More catch-up cuts in 2024 annual rule

CMS’ proposed Calendar Year 2024 Medicare Home Health Prospective Payment System rule includes updates to:
  • the Patient-Driven Groupings Model, Low Utilization Payment Adjustment thresholds, functional levels and comorbidity adjustment subgroups;
  • estimated aggregate payments based on the 30-day payment rate to account for assumed versus actual behavior changes;
  • the HH Value-Based Purchasing and Quality Reporting programs;
  • home intravenous immune globulin items and services, and disposable negative pressure wound therapy device payment rates;
  • medical equipment and supplies, including competitive bidding, as outlined by the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023; and
  • provider and supplier enrollment requirements and oversight.

The HH PPS rule also proposes to add a new Special Focus Program for low-performing hospices.

CMS estimates that the rule will cut aggregate HH agency payments by $375 million nationally. This includes a -1.81% adjustment in the HH annual standard payment rate. These cuts are of critical concern to agencies already facing higher operating costs, a shrinking workforce and the need to manage the downstream patient impact of these factors.

How the proposed HH PPS cuts impact home health providers

1. Continued PDGM and behavior change adjustments drive deeper payment cuts

In the CY 2024 rule, CMS proposed more changes to the Patient-Driven Grouping Model and 30-day standard payment unit implemented in CY 2020. These changes reflect behavior assumptions related to the switch from a 60-day payment rate and to Clinical Group Coding, Comorbidity Coding and Low Utilization Payment Adjustment threshold updates.

CMS believes these changes better align payments and patient care needs, especially for beneficiaries with clinically complex conditions. However, the CAA of 2023 requires that CMS study their impact. As a result, CMS implemented a -3.925% adjustment to the base payment rate adjustment for CY 2022 and proposes a further -5.653% adjustment for CY 2024. It’s important to note that the behavior adjustment is statutory, and there could be more adjustments through CY 2026.

CMS believes this modification may reduce future permanent adjustments and intends to delay additional temporary adjustments to other payment years. These temporary adjustments are to reconcile overpayments that arose from the payment differences between assumed and actual behaviors tied to the 30-day rate unit for CYs 2020 to 2022. The estimated overpayment is $3.439 billion.

2. Fewer patients may receive home healthcare

CMS expressed concern about patient access in the proposed rule based on fewer HH aide service claims and anecdotal evidence. CMS issued a Request for Information on its Fact Sheet to ensure that:

  • beneficiaries have access to all entitled HH services;
  • agencies address barriers and obstacles to hiring HH aides; and
  • HH aide wages equal those in other care settings.

Since the HH payment model changed in 2020, 500,000 fewer Medicare patients have accessed home health services. This is according to the National Association for Home Care and Hospice, which filed suit in July to stop CMS’ payment cuts and asserted that these cuts have indeed “precipitated services limitations or access to care.”

3. More VBP and quality reporting changes could strengthen programs

CMS proposes changes to metrics, data sets and reporting requirements for the Home Health Value-Based Purchasing Model and the Home Health Quality Reporting Program. These changes would help streamline and align CMS quality measures. Program performance impacts HH agency Medicare payments by up to ± 5% for HHVBP and can lead to a ≤2% marketbasket reduction for HHQRP.

CMS expanded HHVBP in 2021 due to strong results. CMS’ analysis showed an annual average improvement of 4.6% in HH agency quality scores and $141 million in savings, all without beneficiary service cuts. In future years, the agency intends to add health equity components to both programs and seeks input on multiple HHQRP measures. This includes cognitive function, behavioral and mental health, patient experience and satisfaction, chronic conditions and pain management.

Get help on the rule update: contact DataGen today!

DataGen hospital and health system clients already received their in-depth analysis of the proposed HH PPS changes.

If your facility needs key PPS data insights backed by an analytics-first approach, contact DataGen for a free consultation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Five key components of a strong patient safety culture

In today’s healthcare environment, ensuring patient safety is more than just a priority — it’s a fundamental component of quality care. Establishing a strong patient safety culture within hospitals and health organizations can dramatically reduce errors, increase patient satisfaction and improve overall healthcare outcomes. But what exactly is a patient safety culture, and how can institutions cultivate it effectively?  This blog post explores the five key components that make up a robust patient safety culture, along with insights from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and The Joint Commission.  What is patient safety culture?  AHRQ defines patient safety culture as how an organization's culture supports and promotes patient safety. This can extend to multiple levels, from individual units to departments to system levels. The AHRQ patient safety culture survey encompasses the shared values, beliefs and norms of healthcare practitioners and staff that...

Community Health Assessment: How to Increase Collaboration

Community Health Assessments (CHAs) are vital for pinpointing community health needs. Enhancing CHAs with greater collaboration, stakeholder engagement and innovation significantly boosts their effectiveness and impact. The biennial CHA process utilizes primary and secondary data to identify priority issues, which assists in developing the Community Health Implementation Plan (CHIP).   1. Engage diverse stakeholders  Inclusive partnerships are essential for addressing health needs effectively by engaging a broad spectrum of stakeholders, including community-based organizations, healthcare providers and policymakers. By involving diverse groups, you can gain a comprehensive understanding of health needs and ensure strong support for health initiatives.   The National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) emphasizes that engaging a variety of stakeholders is crucial for gathering diverse insights and securing backing for these initiatives.   B...