Skip to main content

Making Care Primary: Do you need value-based care experience to apply?

making care primary

Are you a primary care practice that’s considering joining the Making Care Primary model? If so, you may have concerns about the experience needed to participate in a value-based care model. In this blog post, we’ll explore whether VBC experience is a requirement to apply for MCP and what benefits you can expect from the program, regardless of your experience level.

Is value-based care experience required for MCP?

Primary care providers don’t need VBC experience to apply for MCP. However, since MCP is a multi-state initiative, you do need to be located in one of the following states:

  • Colorado;
  • Massachusetts;
  • Minnesota;
  • New Jersey;
  • New Mexico;
  • New York;
  • North Carolina; or
  • Washington.

Note, in New York only upstate counties are included under the model. See Appendix D in the Making Care Primary Request for Applications for more information. 

Is there an advantage for practices with little to no VBC experience?

One of the key benefits of the model is that primary care providers who have no experience with VBC can come in at Track 1 (out of 3). This track is designed to help facilitate the operational setup of the program. Track 1 supports organizations as they build infrastructure and become capable of delivering accountable care. 

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation’s new MCP model means a lot for eligible providers with no previous VBC experience. It’s a major advantage for providers who are small, independent or rural or who support underserved populations and may not have the resources to invest in VBC themselves. Additionally, coming in at Track 1 means that you have the lowest level of potential financial risk for the first two and a half years of the model. During this time, practices will build the foundation needed to redesign their care delivery system and will expand upon that as the model progresses. 

MCP participation benefits providers should consider

In Track 1, providers can take advantage of an upfront infrastructure payment option. This is a time-limited, $72,500 payment that can be used to increase staffing, address patients’ social determinants of health needs or invest in health information technology. 

It’s worth noting that most alternative payment models don’t provide this type of start-up financial support. Historically, providers have had to make the needed practice transformation investments on their own. However, CMS is making it available to those who otherwise may not have the opportunity to explore VBC.

The three-track design of the MCP model means that providers who enter at Track 1 won’t enter Track 3 until the middle of the 10.5-year model. This allows for gradual changes in the required care delivery activities, payment methodology and performance criteria to take place.

Practices will also be able to leverage exclusive learning opportunities and events throughout the duration of the model to encourage the sharing of best practices and information dissemination.

Ultimately, participation in MCP will empower practices to deliver highly coordinated, patient-centered advanced primary care to their patients. 

Need help determining if MCP is right for you? Contact us.

VBC experience is not a requirement to apply for the MCP program. In fact, the program is designed to offer accessibility to providers of all sizes and experience levels. If you’re considering applying, schedule a time to speak with DataGen to discuss how MCP can elevate your care.

Our experts can help give you the robust data and guidance needed to apply and sustain your MCP participation — plus, we’ll even take you through a live demonstration of our performance monitoring analysis platform. In the meantime, read our blog, Making Care Primary Model: 5 crucial things to know, to learn everything you need to know about MCP. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Patient safety culture survey: Why collect data?

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality defines patient safety culture as "the extent to which an organization's culture supports and promotes patient safety." Patient safety culture is influenced by the values, beliefs and norms of healthcare practitioners and other staff. Since these concepts tend to be abstract, organizations looking to improve their patient safety culture must focus on identifying and measuring patient safety-related behaviors.  In this introductory blog, we'll touch on the importance of patient safety data and how it can help create a baseline. From there, you can gain a clearer idea of how to benchmark your facility to create effective patient safety culture improvement strategies.  Why collect patient safety data?  The best way to examine patient safety culture at the department, organization and system levels is to measure data. An organization can implement many different patient safety culture strategies. However, for them to be most

CMS Enhancing Oncology Model Updates: RFA Issued for Second Cohort

Key CMMI updates to the EOM  The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) released exciting updates to the Enhancing Oncology Model (EOM) along with a new opportunity for a second cohort of participants.   The EOM aims to enhance the quality of care for cancer patients while reducing costs under the Medicare fee-for-service program. The updates come on the heels of lower-than-expected model participation .   This blog will discuss key EOM updates, application details, eligibility requirements and important deadlines.  New cohort opportunity  Request for applications: CMS issued an RFA to recruit a second cohort of participants and payers for the EOM.  Timeline:  Second cohort start date: July 1, 2025  Second cohort end date: June 30, 2030  Initial performance period start date: July 1, 2023  Model test end date for all participants: June 30, 2030 (extended from June 30, 2028)  Notable changes to the EOM model  Model extension: The model's duration is extended by two yea