Skip to main content

Impact analysis: Enacted Medicare cuts

DataGen has completed its analysis of enacted Medicare cuts, the results of which are shared here. Please note that this analysis is intended for advocacy purposes only and should be used as an indication of the extent to which hospital providers nationwide have been impacted by existing Medicare provider payment cuts.

These cuts were enacted by Congress to achieve Medicare payment policy and long-term deficit reduction goals. This DataGen impact analysis includes major cuts enacted since 2010.

The enacted legislative cuts analyzed consist of:

  • Medicare marketbasket, Medicare Disproportionate Share Hospital and quality adjustments authorized by the Affordable Care Act of 2010; note that for the purposes of this analysis, quality adjustments are broken out into their own category;
  • the effect of the 2.0% across-the-board sequestration reduction to payments authorized by the Budget Control Act of 2011;
  • inpatient coding adjustment reductions authorized by the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012;
  • the reduction in bad debt payments authorized by the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012;
  • payment adjustments for services paid for under the clinical laboratory fee schedule authorized by the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014;
  • reduction of OPPS payments to non-excepted off-campus sites to a level equivalent to that paid under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule required by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015;
  • marketbasket adjustments authorized by the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015;
  • change in Home Health Prospective Payment System payments resulting from the implementation of the Patient-Driven Grouping Model; and
  • payment reductions authorized by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, including adding hospice to the Inpatient PPS short-stay post-acute care transfer policy.
The enacted regulatory cuts analyzed consist of:
  • regulatory coding adjustments implemented by CMS;
  • 2.0% reduction to the calendar year 2016 outpatient marketbasket update for rate inflation due to packaging of laboratory payments;
  • long-term care hospital site-neutral payment adjustment implemented in the federal fiscal year 2016 final rule;
  • net payment impacts resulting from CMS’ reduction in OPPS payments for 340B Program purchased drugs;
  • reduction in payments for Wholesale Acquisition Cost-based drugs from WAC+6% to WAC+3%;
  • change in Skilled Nursing Facility PPS payment methodology from the Resource Utilization Group-IV system to the Patient-Driven Payment Model; and
  • reduction of OPPS payments for clinic services provided at excepted off-campus sites to a level equivalent to that paid under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule.

The quality cuts analyzed include estimated impacts from Medicare’s Value-based Purchasing, Readmissions Reduction and Hospital-acquired Conditions programs.

These cuts could have a major impact on hospital finances and operations in the coming years. To learn more about this impact and about how to thrive in alternative payment models, contact us today.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Five key components of a strong patient safety culture

In today’s healthcare environment, ensuring patient safety is more than just a priority — it’s a fundamental component of quality care. Establishing a strong patient safety culture within hospitals and health organizations can dramatically reduce errors, increase patient satisfaction and improve overall healthcare outcomes. But what exactly is a patient safety culture, and how can institutions cultivate it effectively?  This blog post explores the five key components that make up a robust patient safety culture, along with insights from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and The Joint Commission.  What is patient safety culture?  AHRQ defines patient safety culture as how an organization's culture supports and promotes patient safety. This can extend to multiple levels, from individual units to departments to system levels. The AHRQ patient safety culture survey encompasses the shared values, beliefs and norms of healthcare practitioners and staff that...
Post a Comment
Read more

Community Health Assessment: How to Increase Collaboration

Community Health Assessments (CHAs) are vital for pinpointing community health needs. Enhancing CHAs with greater collaboration, stakeholder engagement and innovation significantly boosts their effectiveness and impact. The biennial CHA process utilizes primary and secondary data to identify priority issues, which assists in developing the Community Health Implementation Plan (CHIP).   1. Engage diverse stakeholders  Inclusive partnerships are essential for addressing health needs effectively by engaging a broad spectrum of stakeholders, including community-based organizations, healthcare providers and policymakers. By involving diverse groups, you can gain a comprehensive understanding of health needs and ensure strong support for health initiatives.   The National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) emphasizes that engaging a variety of stakeholders is crucial for gathering diverse insights and securing backing for these initiatives.   B...
Post a Comment
Read more