Skip to main content

Start the year off right: DataGen answers your Primary Care First questions

The Primary Care First Model, an alternative payment model offering an innovative payment structure for the delivery of advanced primary care, welcomed the involvement of Cohort 2 participants on Jan. 1. This cohort, which was open to all primary care practices that met the eligibility criteria, will participate from 2022 to 2026.

Participants in PCF Cohorts 1 and 2 can expect the following benefits:
  • an opportunity to increase revenue with performance-based payments that reward participants for reducing acute hospital utilization;
  • the ability to assess and improve performance through actionable, timely data;
  • less administrative burden so providers can spend more time focusing on patient needs; and
  • potential to become a Qualifying APM Participant, which includes eligibility for a 5% incentive payment and eliminates Merit-based Incentive Payment System reporting requirements.
To ensure that new and prior participants succeed in this model, DataGen has compiled and answered some of the top questions we have received about Primary Care First.

How are beneficiaries attributed to practices in the PCF Model?

Beneficiaries are attributed to practices prior to each quarter. If a beneficiary has selected a practitioner on MyMedicare.gov, they will be voluntarily aligned with that practice. Alternatively, if they have not made a selection, they will be attributed to the PCF practitioner that billed their most recent annual wellness visit or welcome to Medicare visit, or based upon a plurality of eligible primary care visits.

What is the payment structure under the PCF Model?

The payment structure under the PCF Model includes a:
  • Total Primary Care Payment
  • Performance-based Adjustment
Total Primary Care Payment: A practice’s TPCP is composed of a Professional Population-Based Payment and a Flat Primary Care Visit Fee. The Professional Population-Based Payment is paid prospectively as a lump sum on a quarterly basis, based on the practice’s total number of assigned beneficiaries and Practice Risk Group. CMS assigns practices to one of four risk groups using the average Hierarchical Condition Category risk scores of their attributed beneficiaries. The Flat Primary Care Visit Fee is paid per face-to-face encounter, including annual wellness visits and relevant telehealth visits.

Performance-based Adjustment: A practice’s PBA (which can be a positive or negative adjustment) is based on quality performance. If a practice passes a minimum quality threshold through the Quality Gateway and meets the national utilization measure benchmark, it will not face a negative adjustment. The practice may be eligible to receive a positive adjustment based on regional performance and continuous improvement. Quality performance will affect payments for the following year.

What is leakage and how can it affect my payments?

Leaked visits are encounters where a beneficiary receives primary care services from a provider outside of the practice. If an organization has multiple practices and a beneficiary receives care at a practice other than the practice the beneficiary was attributed to, this is still considered leakage. Population-based payments will be adjusted for leakage, calculated as the percentage of primary care visits that a beneficiary receives outside of their attributed practice during a four-quarter lookback period. Refinements have recently been made for the performance y2022 leakage adjustment to clarify the provider specialties included and to take place of service restrictions.

How is quality measured in the PCF Model?

CMS uses a focused set of clinical quality and patient experience measures to assess practice quality of care.

The Quality Gateway for practices in risk groups 1 and 2 consists of five measures:
  1. Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Poor Control (> 9%)
  2. Controlling High Blood Pressure
  3. Colorectal Cancer Screening
  4. Advance Care Plan
  5. Patient Experience of Care
The Quality Gateway for practices in risk groups 3 and 4 consists of three measures:
  1. Advance Care Plan
  2. Days at Home
  3. Patient Experience of Care

What data can PCF participants receive from CMS?

CMS offers PCF practices the opportunity to request certain data and reports to support quality improvement, care coordination and health operations. Examples include:
  • Payment and Attribution Reports
  • Beneficiary Data
  • Detailed Claims Data
  • Feedback Reports
Data and reports provided to PCF practices will not include individually identifiable data for beneficiaries who opted out of data sharing.

How can my practice succeed under the PCF Model?

Participating in the PCF Model can be challenging. To navigate the complex program and avoid financial risk, practices should set up workflows that enable them to better measure, manage and act upon data.

Learn more about how DataGen can help you:
  • trend and project PCF program revenue over time;
  • understand patterns of healthcare utilization and outcomes in your aligned beneficiary population by patient risk profile;
  • identify leaked primary care visits by beneficiary, practitioner and location; and
  • monitor the impact of care interventions toward meeting your goals.

Contact us today!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why it's critical for Primary Care First participants to control and understand leakage

Patients' primary care visits outside of their attributed primary care office, also called “leaked” patient visits, can have unintended consequences for Primary Care First participants. Beginning July 2022, PCF Cohort 1 will face a reduction in population-based payments based on their leakage rate. The payment adjustment will be based on their 2021 claims data and will roll forward quarterly. To calculate your leakage rate, divide the number of qualifying visits and services your attributed beneficiaries have made to care centers outside of your practice (for example, visits to urgent care centers) by the total number of qualifying visits and services your attributed beneficiaries have made. Calculating primary care leakage with claims data alone comes with some unintended challenges. Unfortunately, some circumstances can unfairly and negatively impact a practice’s leakage rate: Nuances classifying care delivered by provider team members: It’s difficult to distinguish

What to expect from CMS’ second decade of APM programs

CMS has introduced more than 50 innovative care delivery models designed to drive health system transformation over the last decade. Only six of those produced significant savings; of those, only four met the requirements to be expanded. As the second 10-year period of the program gets underway, which includes $10 billion in new funding, CMS’ Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation is considering numerous changes to improve the overall success of these programs and, in turn, drive overall gains in care outcomes and health equity. When evaluating what has worked in the past and what changes are needed moving forward, it is important to review what success looks like for Alternative Payment Model programs.  CMMI relies on three benchmarks to measure levels of success: The gold standard: improving quality of care while simultaneously reducing expenditures. Improving quality of care without impacting expenditures. Reducing expenditures without impacting quality of car