Skip to main content

2022 Enacted Medicare Cuts Analysis

DataGen’s 2022 Enacted Medicare Cuts Analysis shows how hospitals have been impacted by existing Medicare fee-for-service provider payment cuts enacted by Congress to achieve Medicare payment policy and/or long-term deficit reduction goals. This analysis is provided to DataGen clients for advocacy purposes only.

The impacts shown in this analysis include the major legislative, regulatory and quality cuts enacted since 2010 and are described below. 

Enacted legislative cuts analyzed:

  • Medicare marketbasket, Medicare Disproportionate Share Hospital and quality adjustments authorized by the Affordable Care Act of 2010; note that for this analysis, quality adjustments are broken out into their own category; 
  • the effect of the 2.0% across-the-board sequestration reduction to payments authorized by the Budget Control Act of 2011, and the 4.0% sequestration reduction resulting from the calendar year 2021 triggering of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (PAYGO); 
  • inpatient coding adjustment reductions authorized by the American Taxpayer Relief Act  of 2012; 
  • the reduction in bad debt payments authorized by the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012;
  • payment adjustments for services paid for under the clinical laboratory fee schedule authorized by the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014;
  • reduction of Outpatient Prospective Payment System payments to non-excepted, off-campus sites to a level equivalent to that paid under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, required by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015;
  • marketbasket adjustments authorized by the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015;
  • change in Home Health PPS payments resulting from the implementation of the Patient-Driven Grouping Model; and
  • payment reductions authorized by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, including adding hospice to the Inpatient PPS short-stay, post-acute care transfer policy.

Enacted regulatory cuts analyzed:

  • regulatory coding adjustments implemented by CMS;
  • 2.0% reduction to the CY 2016 outpatient marketbasket update for rate inflation due to packaging of laboratory payments;
  • long-term care hospital site-neutral payment adjustment implemented in the federal fiscal year 2016 final rule;
  • payment impacts resulting from CMS’ reduction in OPPS payments for 340B Program-purchased drugs;
  • reduction in payments for Wholesale Acquisition Cost-based drugs from WAC+6% to WAC+3%;
  • change in SNF PPS payment methodology from the RUG-IV system to the Patient-Driven Payment Model; and
  • reduction of OPPS payments for clinic services provided at excepted off-campus sites to a level equivalent to that paid under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule.

The quality-based payment reform impacts analyzed reflect the IPPS payment adjustments related to three mandatory quality-based payment reform initiatives: the Value-Based Purchasing, Readmissions Reduction and Hospital-Acquired Conditions Reduction programs.

These cuts could have a major impact on hospital finances and operations in the coming years. To learn more about this impact and about how to thrive in alternative payment models, contact us today.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Community Health Needs Assessment examples: Q&A on CHNA data reporting

Include integral data in your Community Health Needs Assessment examples  Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA) examples tend to focus on case studies. However, using integral data for your CHNA can provide overall guidance, making it easier to start and complete your final report. In this Q&A, DataGen’s Melissa Bauer, principal healthcare informatics analyst, explains why using data in the CHNA is key and what types of data you should collect.   Q1: What is CHNA data?   A CHNA requires two types of data: primary and secondary. Using these two data streams, organizations can better characterize the community's health. This helps the organization conducting the CHNA best understand their community needs. It also informs them on the best ways to respond to them, providing guidance on where to start and how to evaluate impact and outcomes. Here’s a further explanation of the data found in a CHNA:  Primary data includes community surveys, focus groups, in-depth interviews, and c

Five key components of a strong patient safety culture

In today’s healthcare environment, ensuring patient safety is more than just a priority — it’s a fundamental component of quality care. Establishing a strong patient safety culture within hospitals and health organizations can dramatically reduce errors, increase patient satisfaction and improve overall healthcare outcomes. But what exactly is a patient safety culture, and how can institutions cultivate it effectively?  This blog post explores the five key components that make up a robust patient safety culture, along with insights from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and The Joint Commission.  What is patient safety culture?  AHRQ defines patient safety culture as how an organization's culture supports and promotes patient safety. This can extend to multiple levels, from individual units to departments to system levels. The AHRQ patient safety culture survey encompasses the shared values, beliefs and norms of healthcare practitioners and staff that influence