Skip to main content

How partnership, data and analytics can help supercharge SDOH outcomes (part 1 of 2)

Partnership has always been essential to achieve healthcare's aims. And where there's a will — and a pandemic — there's a way. To find the way, hospitals and community-based organizations must partner in new ways to incorporate social determinants of health into patient care improvement efforts. Rich new SDOH data sets can supercharge the design, implementation and evaluation of SDOH initiatives as providers are expected to assume more responsibility for outcomes related to non-clinical factors. 

The impact of social determinants of health 

The pandemic resurrected a statistic that has been around for some time: 80% of health outcomes are based on social determinants, with only 20% dependent on clinical care. 

People naturally understand it is harder for someone to manage their diabetes without access to affordable, healthy food. Through the federally-required Community Health Needs Assessment process, hospitals understand local need, but many do not yet know how to shift from a longstanding clinical focus to incorporating SDOH into program design and total cost of care. The coronavirus pandemic has forced a rapid pivot in this direction that would have otherwise taken years to achieve.

Managing total cost of care is essential for value-based care and to achieve healthcare's Triple Aim: better population health management, patient experience and cost control. But the Triple Aim has never explicitly included health equity. A January 2022 article from the Journal of the American Medical Association has called for this very thing, stating, “It is tempting to argue that health equity is already covered in 2 of the aims, better experience of care and better health for populations. But neither is guaranteed unless health equity is made an explicit goal.” The authors add that “quality improvement without equity is a hollow victory.”

With providers now called upon to be a proactive part of SDOH solutions, hospitals and health systems are in a unique yet challenging position to make a difference. Their charge is to support health equity through program sponsorships, collaboration, education and advocacy, all informed by new SDOH data and analytics resources.

The unique role (and challenges) of hospitals and health systems

It doesn't take an exponential funding increase to get started. Even before funding is identified, communication and partnership with community-based organizations are vital and must be guided by what DataGen defines as the Discover-Plan-Act cycle.

The “Discover” phase involves gaining insights using reliable sources of data and proven methods of analysis. A base of meaningful analysis can serve as a tool and prelude to working with CBOs. As the JAMA article puts it: “Quality improvement efforts should . . . [involve] persons from groups and communities that are affected in the planning, designing, and delivery of interventions so they are inclusive, culturally sensitive, and structurally appropriate.”

Please stay tuned. In our next blog, we will further explore how to take the next steps through high-quality alternative SDOH data sources.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why it's critical for Primary Care First participants to control and understand leakage

Patients' primary care visits outside of their attributed primary care office, also called “leaked” patient visits, can have unintended consequences for Primary Care First participants. Beginning July 2022, PCF Cohort 1 will face a reduction in population-based payments based on their leakage rate. The payment adjustment will be based on their 2021 claims data and will roll forward quarterly. To calculate your leakage rate, divide the number of qualifying visits and services your attributed beneficiaries have made to care centers outside of your practice (for example, visits to urgent care centers) by the total number of qualifying visits and services your attributed beneficiaries have made. Calculating primary care leakage with claims data alone comes with some unintended challenges. Unfortunately, some circumstances can unfairly and negatively impact a practice’s leakage rate: Nuances classifying care delivered by provider team members: It’s difficult to distinguish

Start the year off right: DataGen answers your Primary Care First questions

The Primary Care First Model , an alternative payment model offering an innovative payment structure for the delivery of advanced primary care, welcomed the involvement of Cohort 2 participants on Jan. 1 . This cohort, which was open to all primary care practices that met the eligibility criteria, will participate from 2022 to 2026. Participants in PCF Cohorts 1 and 2 can expect the following benefits: an opportunity to increase revenue with performance-based payments that reward participants for reducing acute hospital utilization; the ability to assess and improve performance through actionable, timely data; less administrative burden so providers can spend more time focusing on patient needs; and potential to become a Qualifying APM Participant , which includes eligibility for a 5% incentive payment and eliminates Merit-based Incentive Payment System reporting requirements. To ensure that new and prior participants succeed in this model, DataGen has compiled and answered some of t

What to expect from CMS’ second decade of APM programs

CMS has introduced more than 50 innovative care delivery models designed to drive health system transformation over the last decade. Only six of those produced significant savings; of those, only four met the requirements to be expanded. As the second 10-year period of the program gets underway, which includes $10 billion in new funding, CMS’ Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation is considering numerous changes to improve the overall success of these programs and, in turn, drive overall gains in care outcomes and health equity. When evaluating what has worked in the past and what changes are needed moving forward, it is important to review what success looks like for Alternative Payment Model programs.  CMMI relies on three benchmarks to measure levels of success: The gold standard: improving quality of care while simultaneously reducing expenditures. Improving quality of care without impacting expenditures. Reducing expenditures without impacting quality of car