Skip to main content

What CMMI’s Strategy Refresh means for safety net providers

Innovation that benefits only the privileged is not progress.

While accountable care organizations helped show that a focus on value was missing from healthcare, new ACO priorities reflect that equity has been missing, too — for providers as well as patients. In its recent Strategy Refresh, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation noted that its “Medicare-focused models have limited reach to Medicaid beneficiaries and safety net providers.”

CMMI’s new ACO model and planned improvements to existing ones are designed to help more providers reap the benefits of value-based care.

If it’s broke, fix it

The objectives of accountable care are clear: higher quality at lower costs, involving less waste and a better experience for all. Those outcomes have not fully arrived. CMMI reports that “only six out of more than 50 models launched have generated statistically significant savings to Medicare and to taxpayers” since 2011. The reasons are many but include the need for a new standard of care that:
  • removes barriers;
  • targets social determinants of health; and
  • prioritizes health equity.
Equity tied to payment reform requires a new kind of data and the resources and infrastructure to support it. Providers who serve the underserved have been at a disadvantage. As CMMI notes, this is “due to investments required for care transformation, complexity of model payment and/or participation parameters, administrative burden, and lack of clarity on long-term strategy for models.”

The pandemic exacerbated these challenges while adding new ones: a much-needed focus on the social determinants of health that dictate 80% of patient outcomes.

New incentives and supports to expand participation

CMMI’s Strategy Refresh is a candid assessment of what 10 years of payment reform has achieved and the aspirations it has left on the table. The report identifies the financial and programmatic supports that safety net providers need to be part of equitable accountable care:

"The Innovation Center is considering a variety of incentives … such as upfront payments, social risk adjustment, benchmark considerations, and payment incentives for reducing disparities or screening for SDoH and coordinating with community-based organizations to address social needs. Technical assistance may include application support, sharing of best practices for caring for underserved populations, and assistance with screening tools and data collection workflows."

The health equity expectation

These new commitments span CMMI and CMS models — from the Medicare Shared Savings Program to ACO REACH. Their intent is to help nontraditional providers participate in incentive models that emphasize accountability and health equity along with CMMI’s other objectives: innovation, affordability and partnership.

CMS’s definition of health equity raises the stakes for all providers:

"[T]he attainment of the highest level of health for all people, where everyone has a fair and just opportunity to attain their optimal health regardless of race, ethnicity, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, socioeconomic status, geography, preferred language, or other factors that affect access to care and health outcomes."

CMMI’s goal is to embed health equity across all models with a focus on safety net populations and the providers who see their struggles."

Analytics-forward for equity progress

CMS’ list of “regardless ofs” represents discrete data points that are notoriously difficult to collect, integrate, assess and activate. This puts providers of all types and sizes in a similar boat, regardless of their quality, savvy and access to SDOH data. Addressing complex SDOH needs is difficult, as is obtaining reimbursement for these efforts. Z Codes offer new potential, but the industry is a long way from the standardizations that help make a service and revenue difference.

Equity standards will require a new kind of data strategy and an analytics-forward approach that connects social risk to individualized care plans. CMMI and CMS seek to help providers through learning collaboratives and best practices for accountable care, health equity and financial risk transformation. With this and other data and analytics support, providers who help the underserved may be in a better position to define their destinies.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unlock the Potential of Value-based Payment

A common misconception in healthcare practices: Organizations can quickly reap the benefits of value-based payment transformation. To launch a successful value-based payment program , practices must implement a variety of foundational pieces. It may take time, resources and data before a practice can successfully engage in VBP. In this blog, we'll cover what goes into VBP and its potential benefits. We'll also dig deeper into practice advancement strategies and how they can help you achieve your practice goals. What goes into VBP? Many practices want to implement VBP because of its payment structure and return on investment. Yet, they might not consider how to nurture a successful VBP program in their organization. It starts with a gap analysis regarding people, processes and technologies. It’s important to celebrate what is working well and intervene where improvement can be made. Successful VBP starts with the practice team. There are many perceptions vs. realities that exist

BPCIA: 4 fast facts for a successful Model Year 7 kickoff

Participation in Model Year 7 launched on Jan. 1, 2024, with the first few months being a critical time for providers. New Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced Model (BPCIA) participants got their footing, and continuing participants were able to change their clinical episode service line groups for the first time since 2020.  If you’re a provider participating in this model, read on for a BPCIA refresher and four fast facts for starting MY7 right. We’ll also cover core analytics activities to support your clinical and operational success.   4 Fast facts on BPCIA Model Year 7  1.   Focus on clinical episodes and episode volume  Before MY7 began, providers used historic baseline data provided by CMS to evaluate which CESLGs they would go at risk for, ensuring there would be sufficient episode volume. Large episode volume (100 episodes/year or more) reduces random variation and helps protect providers from financial risk associated with outlier Medicare episode spend.    During