Skip to main content

What CMMI’s Strategy Refresh means for safety net providers

Innovation that benefits only the privileged is not progress.

While accountable care organizations helped show that a focus on value was missing from healthcare, new ACO priorities reflect that equity has been missing, too — for providers as well as patients. In its recent Strategy Refresh, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation noted that its “Medicare-focused models have limited reach to Medicaid beneficiaries and safety net providers.”

CMMI’s new ACO model and planned improvements to existing ones are designed to help more providers reap the benefits of value-based care.

If it’s broke, fix it

The objectives of accountable care are clear: higher quality at lower costs, involving less waste and a better experience for all. Those outcomes have not fully arrived. CMMI reports that “only six out of more than 50 models launched have generated statistically significant savings to Medicare and to taxpayers” since 2011. The reasons are many but include the need for a new standard of care that:
  • removes barriers;
  • targets social determinants of health; and
  • prioritizes health equity.
Equity tied to payment reform requires a new kind of data and the resources and infrastructure to support it. Providers who serve the underserved have been at a disadvantage. As CMMI notes, this is “due to investments required for care transformation, complexity of model payment and/or participation parameters, administrative burden, and lack of clarity on long-term strategy for models.”

The pandemic exacerbated these challenges while adding new ones: a much-needed focus on the social determinants of health that dictate 80% of patient outcomes.

New incentives and supports to expand participation

CMMI’s Strategy Refresh is a candid assessment of what 10 years of payment reform has achieved and the aspirations it has left on the table. The report identifies the financial and programmatic supports that safety net providers need to be part of equitable accountable care:

"The Innovation Center is considering a variety of incentives … such as upfront payments, social risk adjustment, benchmark considerations, and payment incentives for reducing disparities or screening for SDoH and coordinating with community-based organizations to address social needs. Technical assistance may include application support, sharing of best practices for caring for underserved populations, and assistance with screening tools and data collection workflows."

The health equity expectation

These new commitments span CMMI and CMS models — from the Medicare Shared Savings Program to ACO REACH. Their intent is to help nontraditional providers participate in incentive models that emphasize accountability and health equity along with CMMI’s other objectives: innovation, affordability and partnership.

CMS’s definition of health equity raises the stakes for all providers:

"[T]he attainment of the highest level of health for all people, where everyone has a fair and just opportunity to attain their optimal health regardless of race, ethnicity, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, socioeconomic status, geography, preferred language, or other factors that affect access to care and health outcomes."

CMMI’s goal is to embed health equity across all models with a focus on safety net populations and the providers who see their struggles."

Analytics-forward for equity progress

CMS’ list of “regardless ofs” represents discrete data points that are notoriously difficult to collect, integrate, assess and activate. This puts providers of all types and sizes in a similar boat, regardless of their quality, savvy and access to SDOH data. Addressing complex SDOH needs is difficult, as is obtaining reimbursement for these efforts. Z Codes offer new potential, but the industry is a long way from the standardizations that help make a service and revenue difference.

Equity standards will require a new kind of data strategy and an analytics-forward approach that connects social risk to individualized care plans. CMMI and CMS seek to help providers through learning collaboratives and best practices for accountable care, health equity and financial risk transformation. With this and other data and analytics support, providers who help the underserved may be in a better position to define their destinies.


Popular posts from this blog

BPCI Advanced – take advantage of the model extension now

The Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) Advanced Model is now open for applications until May 31, 2023. This model provides a unique opportunity to acute care hospitals and physician group practices who are looking to: evaluate their bundle performance; rejoin if they have previously dropped out due to being under a convener; or take advantage of the changes to the model. With a small window to sign the participation agreement, you’ll need experts to process data quickly and accurately for evaluation. BPCI Advanced Program Details The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced in October 2022 that this program will extend from January 2024 to December 2025. Data used for evaluation will be taken from the baseline period between October 2018 and September 2022. A participation agreement will be sent out in September 2023 and needs to be signed by October 2023 in order to participate. Those who apply before the May 31 deadline will benefit

BPCI Advanced Model Extension

CMS recently made several major announcements about the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced Model.  The model, which was due to expire at the end of 2023 (Model Year 6), will be extended for an additional two years through Dec. 31, 2025.  New applications will be accepted in 2023 for the two-year extension. Participants still active in Model Year 6 can continue without reapplying by signing an amended and restated participation agreement for Model Year 7.  New methodological changes will be implemented for Model Year 6, which starts on Jan. 1, 2023. Methodological changes include that: the CMS Discount Factor for medical clinical episodes will be reduced from 3% to 2%;  the Peer Group Trend Factor Adjustment cap for all clinical episodes will be reduced from 10% to 5%; the Major Joint Replacement of the Upper Extremity clinical episode category will become a multi-setting episode category by allowing episodes to be triggered when the procedure is performed in the hospital ou

You’ve been accepted to the Enhancing Oncology Model. Now what?

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Innovation Center recently announced approved applicants for the new Enhancing Oncology Model. If your facility has been selected by CMS, are you still weighing your options during the current baseline evaluation period?  Two deciding factors may include the program data that CMS provides and whether EOM is enough of an improvement over the prior Oncology Care Model to make your investment worthwhile. Another factor to consider: Will you have the resources in place to conduct a baseline evaluation before EOM’s program start on July 1, 2023? How EOM differs from OCM EOM aims to improve the coordination of oncology care, drive practice transformation and reduce Medicare fee-for-service spending through episode-based payment. It includes three major updates: Fewer cancer types. Compared with OCM’s 21, EOM will be limited to seven common cancer types: breast, prostate, lung, small intestine/colorectal, multiple myeloma, lymphoma and chronic le